Modern JavaScript websites built with Next.js and React, usually paired with a headless CMS. Whether this is the right choice for you depends on your project - and it often isn't, which is worth saying up front.
Next.js renders pages on the server or ahead of time, so a browser receives finished HTML rather than having to build the page itself. For sites where responsiveness and scale genuinely matter, that architectural difference is meaningful.
It also comes with real trade-offs. Hosting works differently, your team edits content in a headless CMS rather than a familiar admin panel, and the build is more involved than a conventional site. For a straightforward business website that gets updated occasionally, WordPress is usually the more sensible choice - and I'd rather tell you that than sell you something heavier than you need.
The honest version of this decision depends on how your site will be used, who maintains it, and what you're planning. Easier to work out on a call than from a page.
A general outline. What actually applies to your project is worked out together, before anything is agreed.
An honest look at whether this approach suits your project, or whether something simpler would serve you better.
Deciding how pages are generated and how content flows through the site.
Developing the interface and connecting it to whichever content system makes sense for your team.
Getting it live, connecting analytics, and making sure the code and accounts are in your hands.
That's the most common question here, and it's easiest to answer on a call. Tell me what the site has to do and I'll be straight with you about whether this is overkill.